Siddhant Rai
2026-05-14 06:33:20

Hi, I've opened a PR for the issue#682 :https://github.com/datazip-inc/olake/pull/950
Could anyone from the team review it? Thanks.

Ishanya Sharma
2026-06-05 09:36:30

Hello, I have opened a PR for the issue #752 https://github.com/datazip-inc/olake/pull/971

can someone please review it? Thank you!

👍 Ankit Sharma, Rohan Khameshra
Superman RX
2026-06-05 14:28:17

Hi Team I've been going through the repo and issues to make my contribution. Just wanted to ask whether issue #661 is still open ? I see a PR with unmerged commits and the last message stating to ping to reopen it

👀 Ankit Sharma
Superman RX
2026-06-09 16:00:15

Hello team I've raised a pr #980 : https://github.com/datazip-inc/olake/pull/980
for the issue #661 : https://github.com/datazip-inc/olake/issues/661#issuecomment-4649469029
Please review it and let me know what needs to be fixed.
Thanks!

Parship
2026-06-13 18:08:43

Hello everyone 👋
I am Parship... currently exploring olake and learning more about the project and the codebase.

👋 Rohan Khameshra
Karthik Balasubramanian
2026-07-09 21:10:50

Hello everyone 👋

I'm karthik a 3rd yr undergrad from LPU, I've been exploring olake lately and i found that in the local postgres setup
olake.io/docs/…/local#…

the docs use host.docker.internal as the host address.

this works on Windows and macOS because Docker Desktop automatically makes host.docker.internal available inside containers.

on Linux, Docker doesn't provide this by default, so it didn't resolve on my machine. docs

the workaround is to use the docker bridge ip as the host address.
so i think the docs needs an updation

OLake
Docker Documentation
👀 Saksham samarth
Karthik Balasubramanian
2026-07-13 17:51:36

hey, i've Opened a PR for the issue#492 github.com/datazip-inc/olake/issues/492

PR :- github.com/datazip-inc/olake/pull/1029

It's related to initial wait time and permission validation in CDC setup
can someone please take a look when you get a moment
Thank you!

cc: @Nayan Joshi

Tanishq Patil
2026-07-23 14:12:48

Hello everyone,
I'm Tanishq, a pre-final yr undergrad from Pune, been contributing to CNCF projects quite a while and recently started exploring olake.
I've opened a PR for issue #912

Issue: github.com/datazip-inc/olake/issues/912
PR: github.com/datazip-inc/olake/pull/1039

By default, sync skips schema discovery to keep runs fast. The --discover-schema flag re-runs discovery and validates configured streams against the source (sync mode, primary keys, cursor fields).
Could someone take a look when you get a chance,

Thank you

1 reply
Nayan Joshi
2026-07-23 14:27:59

Hey @Tanishq Patil we have noted that you have raised a PR and we will assign a reviewer soon.

👍 Tanishq Patil
Krishanu
2026-07-25 16:02:59

Hi Team, i have raised a PR for the issue #777 github.com/datazip-inc/olake/issues/777
PR: github.com/datazip-inc/olake/pull/1045
can someone please review it?
Thank you!

👀 Vaibhav Verma
👍 Ankit Sharma
Krishanu
2026-07-31 17:27:20

Hello team, i have raised a PR for the issue github.com/datazip-inc/olake/issues/776
PR: github.com/datazip-inc/olake/pull/1059
can anyone review it?
Thank you!

Krishanu
2026-08-02 06:46:54

Hi Team 👋
I have raised a PR for issue #1055 to use MapScanConcurrent during incremental syncs for Postgres, MySQL, MSSQL, and Oracle.
PR Link: github.com/datazip-inc/olake/pull/1062
Could someone take a look and review it when available?
Thank you!

👍 Ankit Sharma
5 replies
shubham
2026-08-03 06:19:26

@Krishanu are these tested? can you please share screenshot/recording of your testing in each PR.

shubham
2026-08-03 06:20:40

also @Krishanu can you please ask on the issue if this can be assigned to you before raising, as we have a limited bandwidth to pickup reviews

Krishanu
2026-08-03 06:37:59

Hi Shubham, i will share a screenshot of the testing process.
And Vaibhav assigned me the issue

shubham
2026-08-04 14:47:25

@Krishanu quick summary of internal feedbacks,

  1. Probably we need to work on understanding the issue better rather than start coding on them right away. Better to discuss about few things if you are not sure about things. Ex, PR where Duke has commented.

  2. If AI is being used, please do the self-review. Testing properly by running the sync. Also consider all scenarios that might occur. (Attach atleast one video evidence to the PR that if its working on real sync (debugger or something else))

Krishanu
2026-08-04 14:59:40

Thanks for the feedback, i will take care of this

Karthik Balasubramanian
2026-08-11 19:14:09

hey @Vaibhav Verma I've tested it end-to-end and left some comments
PTAL when you have a moment : )
github.com/datazip-inc/olake/pull/1029

2 replies
Vaibhav Verma
2026-08-11 19:15:19

sure, will try to put one review before monday

Karthik Balasubramanian
2026-08-11 19:16:04

thanks for that

Rishiraj Mukherjee
2026-08-12 10:58:37

Hi @Nayan Joshi I want to work on this , could you please review my plan and assign it to me? github.com/datazip-inc/olake/issues/659

👀 Nayan Joshi
2 replies
Nayan Joshi
2026-08-12 12:10:45

This is not a high priority issue. Can you give me some time so that I can provide you with few issues that are of high priority and can be worked on? Will get back to you soon!

👍 Saksham samarth
Rishiraj Mukherjee
2026-08-12 12:11:41

Thanks a lot

Vishesh Singh
2026-08-17 17:25:37

Hey @Vaibhav Verma I wanna to work on github.com/datazip-inc/olake/issues/649 Would you be able to assign me this issue?

3 replies
Vaibhav Verma
2026-08-17 17:39:33

hi @Vishesh Singh, will get back to you with a higher priority issue for you to work on

Vishesh Singh
2026-08-17 17:47:37

Sure works

Nayan Joshi
2026-08-20 08:34:09

@Vishesh Singh these are the 2 issues that are good first and of higher priority:

  1. github.com/datazip-inc/olake/issues/1131

  2. github.com/datazip-inc/olake/issues/1128


Please go through both the issues and just comment on the one that you want to work on and it will be assigned. Please tag me in the comment.

Rishiraj Mukherjee
2026-08-18 06:35:45

Hi @Nayan Joshi

I've raised PR #1124 for issue #659 (unit tests for types/state.go) —
108 table-driven cases, tests only, no production code changed. Followed
the structure of reformat_test.go as suggested on the issue

github.com/datazip-inc/olake/pull/1124

Comments
1
Karthik Balasubramanian
2026-08-26 16:58:02

@Vaibhav Verma Requested changes has been made and the PR github.com/datazip-inc/olake/pull/1029 is ready to merge.
Take a look when you have a moment.

👍 Vaibhav Verma